Instead of using an “on-the-fly” lambda abomination, I already showed why I think creating a class is easier. But there’s another, even simpler way for C-style structs: the named tuple.
The downsides of the named tuple are that, unlike an “empty” object, you can’t add attributes to it later; and it requires an import. On the upside: a much shorter definition.
Here’s how it works:
# named tuple demo from collections import namedtuple # instead of a class definition: tadaa! Geo = namedtuple('Geo', 'lat, lon') # using the named tuple my_town = Geo(47.6, -45.8) print(my_town.lat, my_town.lon) print(my_town)
You get the best of both worlds; only one line to define your “struct” and only one line to create it. Even better, it will behave like a tuple where needed.
Downsides: an extra line to import something (but it’s from a standard library, so no big deal), and, it being a tuple, you cannot alter the attributes. But in those cases where it doesn’t matter, it’s a great solution!